Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
59.364.4
Basic Information
Xiaomi
Android 14Android
--2014-05-15
--7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches
17.46 ounces12.70 ounces
Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue--
--$ 249.00
Display / Screen
10.5 inches7.9 inches
--1536 x 2048 pixels
IPS LCD --
--324 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.88.1
Performance
Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipsetNvidia Tegra K1 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor
6 GB RAM2 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUKepler GPU
8.828.91
Storage
256 GB internal memory16 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
13.36.72
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.00 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
7.927.48
Networks
--Wi-Fi
02.4
Battery Life
8200mAh Li - Ion Battery6700mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
9.128.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Xiaomi MiPad has a global score of 64.4, which is a bit better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's 59.3 general score. Xiaomi MiPad has a bit faster processor than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has 4 lesser cores and lesser RAM. The Xiaomi MiPad has a much better looking screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a much smaller display.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi MiPad, and although they both have the same aperture, the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi also has a camera in the back with a lot better 13 mega-pixels resolution. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity against 6700mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.