Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 54.4 | 59.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Panasonic | Fujitsu |
| Android 4.0 | Windows 8 Pro |
| -- | 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches |
| 33.60 ounces | 29.92 ounces |
| White | -- |
| $ 79.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| LCD | AH-IPS |
| 170 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4460 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | SD, SDHC external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G) | -- |
| 5.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer and Compass | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is slightly better than Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1, getting a 59.2 score against 54.4. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 comes with Windows 8 Pro OS, while Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1 comes with Android 4.0 OS. The Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1 features just a bit better screen than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 600 x 1024px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1, and although they both have 2 cpu cores, the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 also has a faster graphics processor working at 650 megahertz and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a way better battery life than Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1. The Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1 features a much better camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a much better resolution back camera.
Although Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.