Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 59.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Windows 8 | Android 6.0 |
| 2013-06-20 | 2015-09-29 |
| 10.13 x 6.51 x 0.32 inches | 9.53 x 7.05 x 0.28 inches |
| 20.46 ounces | 17.60 ounces |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 95.00 | $ 645.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.2 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 2560 x 1800 pixels |
| Super PLS LCD | LCD |
| 155 pixels per inch | 307 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom Z2760 chipset | NVIDIA Tegra X1 chipset |
| Saltwell (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (400 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 545 @ 533 MHz GPU | NVIDIA Maxwell GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 5.8 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | -- |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel C, with a overall score of 65 against 59.4. Samsung ATIV Tab 3 has Windows 8 OS, and Google Pixel C counts with Android 6.0 OS. Although the Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is better than Google Pixel C, we must highlight that it's also a lot older, heavier and thicker.
Google Pixel C counts with a much sharper display than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, because it has a bit larger screen, a little bit brighter screen, a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1800 x 2560. The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 features a really superior performance than Google Pixel C, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel C has a much better camera than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel C also has a back camera with a way higher resolution. Google Pixel C's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Samsung ATIV Tab 3's one, and although the Google Pixel C has no SD memory card expansion slot, they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel C's battery lifetime is just as good as the Samsung ATIV Tab 3 one.
In addition to being the best tablet between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.