Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Windows 8 | Android |
| 2013-06-20 | 2014-05-15 |
| 10.13 x 6.51 x 0.32 inches | 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches |
| 20.46 ounces | 12.70 ounces |
| $ 95.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| Super PLS LCD | -- |
| 155 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom Z2760 chipset | Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset |
| Saltwell (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (400 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 545 @ 533 MHz GPU | Kepler GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 5.8 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 6700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 8.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung ATIV Tab 3 has an overall score of 65, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi MiPad's 64.4 general score. The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is an older and much heavier device than the Xiaomi MiPad, but Samsung could make it just a bit thinner anyway. The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 counts with Windows 8 OS, and Xiaomi MiPad works with Android OS.
The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the Xiaomi MiPad also has a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi MiPad features a more vivid display than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 2048 x 1536 resolution and a lot greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung ATIV Tab 3 counts with a greater storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi MiPad has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung ATIV Tab 3. Xiaomi MiPad features a lot better camera than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Xiaomi MiPad also has a camera with way more MP.
Samsung ATIV Tab 3 not only is the best tablets of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other tablets.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.