Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 57.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Windows 8 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2013-06-20 | 2021-09-23 |
| 10.13 x 6.51 x 0.32 inches | 10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 inches |
| 20.46 ounces | 18.03 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic Black and Pearl White |
| $ 95.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 11 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| Super PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 155 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom Z2760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Saltwell (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485 Gold, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (400 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 545 @ 533 MHz GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 3.78 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 5.8 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8720mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung ATIV Tab 3 has a score of 65, which is better than the Xiaomi pad 5's general score of 57.7. Even being the best portable tablet we compare here, it must be told that it is also a noticeably older, heavier and somewhat thicker portable tablet. Samsung ATIV Tab 3 works with Windows 8 OS, while Xiaomi pad 5 comes with Android 12 OS.
Samsung ATIV Tab 3 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi pad 5, although it has a way lower resolution of 768 x 1366 pixels, a way worse screen pixels density and a quite smaller screen. Samsung ATIV Tab 3 features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi pad 5, although it has 6 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi pad 5 features a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi pad 5 shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, because it has a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Xiaomi pad 5 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung ATIV Tab 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.