Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
69.257.9
Basic Information
Samsung
Windows 8Android 14
2012-08-29--
11.97 x 7.46 x 0.39 inches--
26.46 ounces18.84 ounces
BlueSpace Grey; Sky Blue
$ 230.00--
Display / Screen
11.6 inches10.9 inches
1366 x 768 pixels --
LCDIPS LCD
135 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
6.95.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 chipset
Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
2 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Intel SGX545 Graphics GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.378.91
Storage
128 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotNo SD card slot
10.110.1
Camera
8.00 MP + 2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
6.387.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
LTE (4G) and HSPA--
--Nano SIM
5.40
Battery Life
4080mAh Li-Ion Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
144 hours standby time
--
68.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 5.0
--GPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung ATIV Tab 5 has a global score of 69.2, which is much better than the OSCAL Pad 90's general score of 57.9. Samsung ATIV Tab 5 counts with Windows 8 operating system, while OSCAL Pad 90 comes with Android 14 operating system. Samsung ATIV Tab 5 has a sharper display than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a quite larger display.

The OSCAL Pad 90 features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as Samsung ATIV Tab 5, and although the OSCAL Pad 90 has no SD memory card expansion slot, they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a bit better processor than Samsung ATIV Tab 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more CPU cores.

OSCAL Pad 90 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung ATIV Tab 5, because it has a lot more megapixels camera. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung ATIV Tab 5, because it has an 89% bigger battery size.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.