Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 13 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) has a general score of 77.4, which is much better than the OSCAL Pad 15's score of 64.4. Both tablets in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) has a more recent 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13 version, providing some additional features. Even being the best in this comparison, GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) is a just a little thicker and somewhat heavier tablet than the OSCAL Pad 15.
Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) has a much better looking display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater display pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1600 x 2560 pixels. The OSCAL Pad 15 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) counts with just a bit better performance than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has 4 less processing cores (although faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. The OSCAL Pad 15 has just a bit better battery lifetime than GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition), because it has 8280mAh of battery capacity.
OSCAL Pad 15 has a little bit better camera than GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition), because it has a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.