Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 59.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 19.29 ounces | 17.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | -- |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) has a general score of 77.4, which is way better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's 59.3 general score. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) has 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version, giving some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) has a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) counts with a much better screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a quite smaller display.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a lot better camera than Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition), because it has a way higher 13 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's battery lifetime is very similar to GALAXY Note 10.1 (2014 Edition)'s battery duration, although the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has just 8200mAh of battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.