Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 66.3 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4, 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0 | Android 13 |
| 2012-02-27 | 2023-08-20 |
| 10.31 x 7.09 x 0.35 inches | 9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches |
| 21.16 ounces | 30.12 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 435.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Super PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 149 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| -- | 360 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 5.5 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 13000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 is just a bit better than the OSCAL Spider 8, with a global score of 66.3 against 64.4. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 has an older 4.4 version and OSCAL Spider 8 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 body is lighter and notably thinner than the OSCAL Spider 8, even though it was released 12 years before.
The OSCAL Spider 8 has a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a better display than Galaxy Note 10.1, and although they both have a same size screen, the OSCAL Spider 8 also has a much greater screen pixel density and a lot higher 1200 x 1920px resolution.
The OSCAL Spider 8 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a camera with lot more mega-pixels. OSCAL Spider 8 features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
OSCAL Spider 8 features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has 13000mAh of battery capacity against 7000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.