Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
54.259.3
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 2.3.5, 2.2Android 14
2011-03-16--
4.87 x 2.53 x 0.39 inches--
4.97 ounces17.46 ounces
--Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
$ 215.00--
Display / Screen
4 inches10.5 inches
480 x 800 pixels --
Super Clear LCDIPS LCD
233 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.15.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
512 MB RAM6 GB RAM
PowerVR SGX 540 GPUMali-G57 GPU
7.388.82
Storage
16 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
5.7213.3
Camera
3.20 MP + 0.30 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
5.57.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
2.40
Battery Life
1200mAh Li-Ion Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
2.889.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
Accelerometer, Compass and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S WiFi 4.0, having a global score of 59.3 against 54.2. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S WiFi 4.0 has Android 2.3.5 version. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is a way heavier but a lot thinner device than Samsung Galaxy S WiFi 4.0.

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a faster processing unit than Galaxy S WiFi 4.0, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S WiFi 4.0 has a way better looking display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a way smaller display. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S WiFi 4.0, because it has a much better resolution camera.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S WiFi 4.0, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S WiFi 4.0, because it has an 8200mAh battery capacity against 1200mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.