Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
58.157.9
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 4.0.4, 3.0Android 14
2011-03-22--
10.09 x 6.81 x 0.34 inches--
19.93 ounces18.84 ounces
--Space Grey; Sky Blue
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 410.00--
Display / Screen
10.1 inches10.9 inches
1280 x 800 pixels --
TFTIPS LCD
149 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
75.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 chipset
Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
--8 GB RAM
Yes GPUMali-G57 GPU
7.478.91
Storage
32 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
5.810.1
Camera
3.00 MP + 2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (24 fps) (Full HD) video resolution--
6.497.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM--
SIMNano SIM
3.90
Battery Life
6800mAh Li-Ion Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.168.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is slightly better than OSCAL Pad 90, having a 58.1 score against 57.9. Both tablets in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 has 4.0.4 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a more powerful processor than Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has a greater number of cores.

Galaxy Tab 10.1 features a way better display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a little bit smaller display. The OSCAL Pad 90 features a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has a 7700mAh battery capacity.

The OSCAL Pad 90 features a very superior camera than Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 13 mega pixels resolution.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.