Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.1, 4.0 | Android 13 |
| 2012-09-28 | -- |
| 10.10 x 6.90 x 0.38 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 20.70 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| Super PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 149 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 5.5 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 624 hours standby time | -- |
| 8.32 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) is a bit better than the OSCAL Pad 15, with a 65 score against 64.4. Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) is a thicker and notably heavier tablet than the OSCAL Pad 15. Both tablets in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) has the older 4.1 version and OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13.
The OSCAL Pad 15 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T) features a bit more vivid display than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has a bit worse resolution of 800 x 1280 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display.
OSCAL Pad 15 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T), because it has 240 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. OSCAL Pad 15 captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T), because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels.
OSCAL Pad 15 has superior battery performance than Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (AT&T), because it has an 18% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.