| Global Score | |
| 65.9 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.2 | Android 13 |
| 2013-06-03 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.93 x 0.31 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 18.06 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| Brown and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 149 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom chipset | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Dual-Core 1600 MHz processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.38 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 40 hours talk time | -- |
| 8.16 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch has a score of 65.9, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Pad 15's global score of 64.4. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch has the previous 4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13. Even being the best tablet device in this comparison review, the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch design is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than OSCAL Pad 15.
The OSCAL Pad 15 has a little sharper display than Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch, because it has a little greater pixels number in each inch of screen, a quite larger display and a better resolution of 1200 x 1200. The OSCAL Pad 15 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch, because it has 224 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The OSCAL Pad 15 has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch, because it has 6 more 1.6 gigahertz CPU cores and 7 GB more RAM. The OSCAL Pad 15 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP. The OSCAL Pad 15 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Tab 3 10.1-inch, because it has 8280mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.