Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 70.2 | 57.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-01 | -- |
| 10.01 x 6.11 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 18.52 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Space Grey; Sky Blue |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | -- |
| Super PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Unisoc T606 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.36 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7300mAh Battery | 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.48 | 8.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) is way better than OSCAL Pad 90, with a score of 70.2 against 57.9. Both of these tablets use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has the newer 8.1 Oreo version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14. OSCAL Pad 90 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) counts with a sharper screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a little bit smaller display. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The OSCAL Pad 90 features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because it has 7700mAh of battery capacity against 7300mAh. The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) features just a bit better camera than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has a back camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.