Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 70.2 | 59.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-01 | -- |
| 10.01 x 6.11 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 18.52 ounces | 17.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | -- |
| Super PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.36 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7300mAh Battery | 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.48 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) is better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, having a overall score of 70.2 against 59.3. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) has a newer 8.1 Oreo version and OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14, so it provides you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) features a better looking screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) captures a little bit better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), because it has an 8200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.