Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 57.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | -- |
| 10.24 x 6.34 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 18.84 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Space Grey; Sky Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 10.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | -- |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 216 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Unisoc T606 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.36 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.48 | 8.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has a general score of 74.5, which is a lot better than OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 general score. Both tablets we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 body weights the same than the OSCAL Pad 90, but it's a lot thicker.
OSCAL Pad 90 has a CPU that's just as good as the Galaxy Tab A 10.5 one, and although the OSCAL Pad 90 has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Tab A 10.5 features a brighter screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a little bit smaller display. Galaxy Tab A 10.5 has a slightly better camera than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has a way less MP camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light environments.
The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Tab A 10.5, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Tab A 10.5, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.