Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
60.457.9
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 5.1 LollipopAndroid 14
2016-04-01--
7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches--
9.98 ounces18.84 ounces
16 777 216Space Grey; Sky Blue
$ 150.00--
Display / Screen
7 inches10.9 inches
1280 x 800 pixels --
TFT IPS LCD
216 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.75.8
Performance
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipsetUnisoc T606 chipset
ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
1,5 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Mali-T720 GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.198.91
Storage
8 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
6.0610.1
Camera
5.00 MP + 2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution--
6.717.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
--Nano SIM
2.40
Battery Life
4000mAh Li - Ion Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
5.928.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0 Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy Tab A (2016) is a little bit better than OSCAL Pad 90, getting a 60.4 score against 57.9. These tablets use Android operating system, but Galaxy Tab A (2016) has the newer 5.1 Lollipop version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14, so it provides the user some extra features and improved performance.

The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has 6,5 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cores. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) has a better display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a much smaller screen. The OSCAL Pad 90 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 120 GB more internal memory capacity.

OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a 93 percent larger battery size. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a better camera than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a much higher 13 mega pixels resolution camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.