Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 60.4 | 59.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 14 |
| 2016-04-01 | -- |
| 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 9.98 ounces | 17.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | -- |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 216 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.71 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| 2.4 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab A (2016) has an overall score of 60.4, which is slightly better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's 59.3 general score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Tab A (2016) has the newer 5.1 Lollipop version while OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version, so it gives you some nice extra features.
The Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a more vivid screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a much smaller screen. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 248 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a better camera than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a lot higher resolution camera in the back. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has an 8200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.