Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 57.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-10 | -- |
| 8.35 x 4.89 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 12.84 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Space Grey; Sky Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 10.9 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 189 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset | Unisoc T606 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2017) is much better than OSCAL Pad 90, getting a score of 65.7 against 57.9. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2017) has newer 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2017) features a more vivid screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a way smaller display.
OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2017), because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cores.
The OSCAL Pad 90 has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2017), because it has a 54% greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2017) has a slightly better camera than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has a much worse 8 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.