Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 59.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-28 | -- |
| 8.42 x 4.99 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 15.03 ounces | 17.46 ounces |
| Black | Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 490.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 283 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.36 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| 6.1 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab Active 3 is way better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, having a 79 score against 59.3. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Tab Active 3 has the previous 10 version while OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3 counts with a much sharper display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a really smaller display.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Tab Active 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Tab Active 3 features a bit more powerful processor than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Tab Active 3, because it has a 62 percent more battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3 takes a bit better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi. Both have a 13 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.