Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-28 | 2014-05-15 |
| 8.42 x 4.99 x 0.39 inches | 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches |
| 15.03 ounces | 12.70 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 490.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 283 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Kepler GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| 6.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3 is way better than Xiaomi MiPad, with a global score of 79 against 64.4. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3 body is notably newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi MiPad. Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3 has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Tab Active 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 2048 x 1536 resolution and a just a bit better pixels density. Galaxy Tab Active 3 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3 counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much higher resolution back camera. The Xiaomi MiPad counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3 costs a lot more than the Xiaomi MiPad, but you can get a much better tablet for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.