Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4 | Android 13 |
| 2014-01-06 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.29 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 16.54 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 539.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 7 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 is much better than the OSCAL Pad 15, having a score of 74.6 against 64.4. Both tablets in this comparison review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 has older 4.4 version while OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 body is just a little thinner but just a bit heavier than the OSCAL Pad 15.
The Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 has a bit more powerful processing unit than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has 6 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 features a way better display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better display pixels density and a way better 1600 x 2560 resolution.
OSCAL Pad 15 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, because it has a way better resolution back camera. OSCAL Pad 15 features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 256 GB internal storage.
The OSCAL Pad 15 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, because it has an 8280mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.