| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13 |
| 2014-06-12 | -- |
| 8.38 x 4.94 x 0.26 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 10.51 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.4 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 359 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 5 Octa 5420 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 7.48 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4900mAh Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 6.72 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
The Galaxy Tab S 8.4 is much better than the OSCAL Pad 15, getting a overall score of 74.5 against 64.4. Both tablets we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Tab S 8.4 has 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13 version. Galaxy Tab S 8.4's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter than the OSCAL Pad 15.
OSCAL Pad 15 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Pad 15 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Tab S 8.4 counts with a lot better screen than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1600 pixels and a much higher count of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has a camera with a way worse 8 mega pixels resolution. The OSCAL Pad 15 has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy Tab S 8.4, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
OSCAL Pad 15 counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4, because it has 8280mAh of battery capacity against 4900mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.