Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4
32 GBSM-T705
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 57.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-12 | -- |
| 8.38 x 4.94 x 0.26 inches | -- |
| 10.51 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Space Grey; Sky Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.4 inches | 10.9 inches |
| 1600 x 2560 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 359 pixels per inch | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 5 Octa 5420 chipset | Unisoc T606 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 7.48 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4900mAh Battery | 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 6.72 | 8.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 is much better than the OSCAL Pad 90, getting a score of 74.5 against 57.9. Both tablets in this review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 has 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14, so it provides you some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The OSCAL Pad 90 features a bit better processor than Galaxy Tab S 8.4, and although they both have 8 cores, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has 5 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Tab S 8.4 has a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a much smaller display. The OSCAL Pad 90 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Tab S 8.4, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The OSCAL Pad 90 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Tab S 8.4, because it has a camera with a much better resolution. OSCAL Pad 90 has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4, because it has a 7700mAh battery capacity against 4900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.