Compare tablets
Nokia Lumia 2520
AT&TRX-114
| Global Score | |
| 61.5 | 68.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Windows RT 8.1 |
| 2015-11-08 | 2013-10-22 |
| 17.79 x 10.86 x 0.47 inches | 10.51 x 6.61 x 0.35 inches |
| 93.48 ounces | 21.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| $ 599.00 | $ 580.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 18.4 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 120 pixels per inch | 218 pixels per inch |
| -- | 665 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 2.10 MP | 6.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.29 inches (1/3.4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 0.55 | 8.25 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 8000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 600 hours standby time |
| 7.36 | 8.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Lumia 2520 is much better than the Galaxy View, getting a overall score of 68.6 against 61.5. Lumia 2520 is an a lot older device than Galaxy View, but Nokia managed to build it notably thinner and way lighter anyway. The Lumia 2520 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy View, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Lumia 2520 also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Lumia 2520 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy View, because although it has a lot smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Lumia 2520 also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen. Nokia Lumia 2520 takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy View.
The Samsung Galaxy View features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Lumia 2520, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Nokia Lumia 2520 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy View, because it has an 8000mAh battery size against 5700mAh.
Lumia 2520 is not only the best tablets between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy View, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
