Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
61.557.9
Basic Information
Samsung
--Android 14
2015-11-08--
17.79 x 10.86 x 0.47 inches--
93.48 ounces18.84 ounces
16 777 216Space Grey; Sky Blue
$ 599.00--
Display / Screen
18.4 inches10.9 inches
1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD)--
TFT IPS LCD
120 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.95.8
Performance
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipsetUnisoc T606 chipset
ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
2 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Mali-T720 MP2 GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.738.91
Storage
64 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
10.0210.1
Camera
2.10 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
0.557.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
Mobile Hotspot--
LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSUPA--
Nano SIMNano SIM
5.70
Battery Life
5700mAh Li - Ion Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
7.368.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy View is slightly better than OSCAL Pad 90, getting a 61.5 score against 57.9. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy View, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy View has a little sharper display than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a much bigger display.

OSCAL Pad 90 features slightly more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy View, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. OSCAL Pad 90 has greater battery duration than Galaxy View, because it has a 7700mAh battery size against 5700mAh. OSCAL Pad 90 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy View.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.