Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
61.559.3
Basic Information
Samsung
--Android 14
2015-11-08--
17.79 x 10.86 x 0.47 inches--
93.48 ounces17.46 ounces
16 777 216Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
$ 599.00--
Display / Screen
18.4 inches10.5 inches
1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD)--
TFT IPS LCD
120 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.95.8
Performance
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
2 GB RAM6 GB RAM
Mali-T720 MP2 GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.738.82
Storage
64 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
10.0213.3
Camera
2.10 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
0.557.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
Mobile Hotspot--
LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSUPA--
Nano SIM--
5.70
Battery Life
5700mAh Li - Ion Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
7.369.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy View has a score of 61.5, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's 59.3 score. Samsung Galaxy View features a bit better looking screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because it has a really bigger display. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a little better processing power than Galaxy View, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi also has a higher amount of RAM.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy View, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a way better battery duration than Galaxy View, because it has a 44% greater battery size.

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy View.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.