Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
65.359.3
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 8.1 OreoAndroid 14
2019-04-26--
16.43 x 10.37 x 0.68 inches--
78.72 ounces17.46 ounces
16 777 216Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
$ 740.00--
Display / Screen
17.3 inches10.5 inches
1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD)--
IPS LCD IPS LCD
127 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
65.8
Performance
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
3 GB RAM6 GB RAM
Mali-G71 MP2 GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.738.82
Storage
64 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
11.3413.3
Camera
5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
0.667.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
Mobile Hotspot--
LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA--
Nano SIM--
6.30
Battery Life
12000mAh Li - Ion Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
11.449.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0, EDR Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy View 2 has a general score of 65.3, which is better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's 59.3 general score. These tablets include Android operating system, but the Galaxy View 2 has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy View 2 has a slightly better looking screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because it has a really larger display.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy View 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi also has more RAM memory. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a lot better camera than Galaxy View 2. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy View 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.

Galaxy View 2 has a superior battery duration than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because it has a 46% bigger battery size.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.