Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android | Android 13 |
| 2015-11-27 | -- |
| 7.89 x 5.22 x 0.27 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 11.36 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 203.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 2048 x 1536 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom x5 Z850 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 7.48 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6190mAh Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.68 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 is just a bit better than the OSCAL Pad 15, having a 65.7 score against 64.4. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 is a a lot lighter and a bit thinner device than the OSCAL Pad 15. The Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 counts with Android OS, while OSCAL Pad 15 counts with Android 13 OS. OSCAL Pad 15 has a processor that is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 one, although the OSCAL Pad 15 also has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (although they are slower).
Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 features a sharper display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1536 x 2048 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 captures slightly better photos and videos than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has a way lower 8 mega-pixels resolution camera.
OSCAL Pad 15 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Pad 2, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB and 192 GB more internal memory. OSCAL Pad 15 features superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Pad 2, because it has 8280mAh of battery capacity against 6190mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.