Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
65.759.3
Basic Information
Xiaomi
Android Android 14
2015-11-27--
7.89 x 5.22 x 0.27 inches--
11.36 ounces17.46 ounces
16 777 216Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
Aluminum --
$ 203.00--
Display / Screen
7.9 inches10.5 inches
2048 x 1536 pixels --
--IPS LCD
324 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
7.65.8
Performance
Intel Atom x5 Z850 chipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
2 GB RAM6 GB RAM
Yes GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.918.82
Storage
64 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
7.713.3
Camera
8.00 MP + 5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
7.487.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
2.40
Battery Life
6190mAh Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
7.689.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has an overall score of 65.7, which is much better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's 59.3 score. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 comes with Android OS, and OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with Android 14 OS. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has a bit faster CPU than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM.

Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 counts with a much sharper screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a much smaller screen. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Pad 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Pad 2, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity against 6190mAh.

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Pad 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi also has a way better resolution back facing camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.