Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 59.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Fujitsu |
| Android | Windows 8 Pro |
| 2014-05-15 | -- |
| 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches | 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 29.92 ounces |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1536 x 2048 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| -- | AH-IPS |
| 324 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Kepler GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | SD, SDHC external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6700mAh Battery | 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi MiPad has an overall score of 64.4, which is slightly better than the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's 59.2 score. Xiaomi MiPad is a a lot lighter and thinner tablet than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. The Xiaomi MiPad works with Android operating system, and Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 works with Windows 8 Pro operating system.
Xiaomi MiPad features a much better display than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a much better 2048 x 1536 pixels resolution and a way greater pixel amount per screen inch. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Xiaomi MiPad, because although the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with an additional graphics processor and more RAM. Xiaomi MiPad has a very superior battery lifetime than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has 6700mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi MiPad counts with a way better camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi MiPad also has a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Xiaomi MiPad not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.