Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HP |
| Android | Windows 8.1 |
| 2014-05-15 | 2014-02-23 |
| 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1536 x 2048 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| 324 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Kepler GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 7.48 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6700mAh Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.08 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi MiPad is much better than the HP ProPad 600, with a 64.4 score against 58.2. The Xiaomi MiPad is a notably lighter and thinner portable tablet than the HP ProPad 600, even though both were only released with a couple of months difference. Xiaomi MiPad counts with Android operating system, and HP ProPad 600 counts with Windows 8.1 operating system.
Xiaomi MiPad counts with a little bit better looking screen than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 2048 x 1536. The Xiaomi MiPad features a bit better processing unit than HP ProPad 600, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Quad-Core processing unit.
The HP ProPad 600 features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi MiPad features a superior camera than HP ProPad 600. Both have a same resolution back camera.
HP ProPad 600 counts with longer battery duration than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi MiPad is a lot more expensive than the HP ProPad 600, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.