Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
64.457.9
Basic Information
Xiaomi
AndroidAndroid 14
2014-05-15--
7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches--
12.70 ounces18.84 ounces
--Space Grey; Sky Blue
$ 249.00--
Display / Screen
7.9 inches10.9 inches
1536 x 2048 pixels --
--IPS LCD
324 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
8.15.8
Performance
Nvidia Tegra K1 chipsetUnisoc T606 chipset
ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
2 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Kepler GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.918.91
Storage
16 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
6.7210.1
Camera
8.00 MP + 5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
7.487.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
--Nano SIM
2.40
Battery Life
6700mAh Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.088.8
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0
--GPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Xiaomi MiPad is better than the OSCAL Pad 90, with a 64.4 score against 57.9. Xiaomi MiPad counts with a much sharper screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a way smaller display. OSCAL Pad 90 features a processor that's just as good as the CPU in Xiaomi MiPad, although the OSCAL Pad 90 also has 4 more CPU cores (but slower) and a greater amount of RAM memory.

OSCAL Pad 90 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi MiPad, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OSCAL Pad 90 also has a camera with way more MP. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.

The OSCAL Pad 90 has a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a 7700mAh battery size.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.