Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
64.459.3
Basic Information
Xiaomi
AndroidAndroid 14
2014-05-15--
7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches--
12.70 ounces17.46 ounces
--Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
$ 249.00--
Display / Screen
7.9 inches10.5 inches
1536 x 2048 pixels --
--IPS LCD
324 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
8.15.8
Performance
Nvidia Tegra K1 chipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
2 GB RAM6 GB RAM
Kepler GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.918.82
Storage
16 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
6.7213.3
Camera
8.00 MP + 5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
7.487.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
2.40
Battery Life
6700mAh Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.089.12
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Xiaomi MiPad is a little bit better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, getting a 64.4 score against 59.3. Xiaomi MiPad has a bit better CPU than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM. The Xiaomi MiPad features a lot better looking display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a lot smaller display.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi shoots clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi MiPad, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi also has a back-facing camera with a much better 13 megapixels resolution.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features longer battery duration than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity instead of 6700mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.