Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0
LTE 16 GB| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 66.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 |
| 2014-05-15 | 2013-04-29 |
| 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches | 7.40 x 4.37 x 0.39 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 10.72 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 220.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 7 inches |
| 1536 x 2048 pixels | 1024 x 600 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 324 pixels per inch | 170 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1,5 GB (533 MHz) RAM |
| Kepler GPU | Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 3.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 7.48 | 5.61 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 408 hours standby time |
| 8.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 has a general score of 66.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi MiPad's overall score of 64.4. The Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 body is somewhat lighter than Xiaomi MiPad, although it's thicker and was released around 13 months before. The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Tab 3 7.0, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Tab 3 7.0, because it has much more pixels per inch of display, a lot better 2048 x 1536 pixels resolution and a quite larger display. Xiaomi MiPad has a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0, and although they both have equal 16 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi MiPad also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi MiPad shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera. The Xiaomi MiPad features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0, because it has 6700mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best tablet between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is also cheap compared to the other tablet, which makes this tablet a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.