Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2014-05-15 | 2020-09-28 |
| 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches | 8.42 x 4.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 15.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | $ 490.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 1536 x 2048 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 283 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Kepler GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| 2.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6700mAh Battery | 5050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Tab Active 3 has a general score of 79, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi MiPad's 64.4 general score. Galaxy Tab Active 3's design is incredibly newer than Xiaomi MiPad's, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy Tab Active 3 features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Xiaomi MiPad counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Tab Active 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display and a slightly better 2048 x 1536 resolution. The Galaxy Tab Active 3 has a superior camera than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Tab Active 3 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 48 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi MiPad counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
The Galaxy Tab Active 3 costs a lot more money than Xiaomi MiPad, but you can get a much better tablet for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.