Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2014-05-15 | 2017-03-24 |
| 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches | 9.34 x 6.65 x 0.24 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 15.13 ounces |
| -- | Black and Silver |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 240.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 9.7 inches |
| 1536 x 2048 pixels | 2048 x 1536 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Kepler GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| 2.4 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6700mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Tab S3 has an overall score of 75.2, which is much better than the Xiaomi MiPad's 64.4 overall score. The Galaxy Tab S3 is a much newer and a lot thinner tablet device than Xiaomi MiPad, although it is heavier. Galaxy Tab S3's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Xiaomi MiPad, and although the Galaxy Tab S3 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Quad-Core CPU.
Xiaomi MiPad features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Tab S3, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 2048 x 1536 resolution, the Xiaomi MiPad also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Tab S3 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Tab S3 has a way better camera than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture. Xiaomi MiPad counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Tab S3, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best tablet of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
