Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.759.2
Basic Information
XiaomiFujitsu
Android 12, 11Windows 8 Pro
2021-09-23--
10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 inches11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches
18.03 ounces29.92 ounces
Cosmic Black and Pearl White--
--$ 1149.00
Display / Screen
11 inches11.6 inches
2560 x 1600 pixels 1366 x 768 pixels
IPS LCD AH-IPS
274 pixels per inch135 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.66.9
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset--
Kryo 485 Gold, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3 MHz) processorIntel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor
6 GB RAM4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM
Adreno 640 GPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU
3.788.91
Storage
128 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
No SD card slotSD, SDHC external memory slot
10.113.3
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP5.00 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
9.465.5
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
2.42.4
Battery Life
8720mAh Battery3150mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
9.445.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer

Comparison review

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has an overall score of 59.2, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi pad 5's general score of 57.7. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with Windows 8 Pro operating system, and Xiaomi pad 5 works with Android 12 operating system. Even being the best tablet device in this comparison review, Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's construction is noticeably heavier and a lot thicker than Xiaomi pad 5.

Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a much better processing power than Xiaomi pad 5, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a GPU. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi pad 5, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 768 x 1366 and a way worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi pad 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi pad 5 counts with a greater camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a much higher (4K) video resolution and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.

Xiaomi pad 5 has a way better battery performance than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a 177% greater battery size.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.