Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 59.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-23 | -- |
| 10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 18.03 ounces | 17.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Pearl White | Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485 Gold, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 3.78 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| 2.4 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8720mAh Battery | 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.44 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is slightly better than the Xiaomi pad 5, getting a 59.3 score against 57.7. Both of these tablets include Android OS (operating system), but the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi pad 5 has Android 12 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and better performance. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is a noticeably thinner and a bit lighter tablet than Xiaomi pad 5.
Xiaomi pad 5 counts with a more vivid display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because it has a little bit bigger screen. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi pad 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much better performing processor than Xiaomi pad 5. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi pad 5 features a little better battery performance than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because it has an 8720mAh battery size against 8200mAh. The Xiaomi pad 5 shoots much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi. Both have a back camera with a 13 megapixels and a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.