Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 65 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Windows 8 |
| 2021-09-23 | 2013-06-20 |
| 10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 inches | 10.13 x 6.51 x 0.32 inches |
| 18.03 ounces | 20.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Pearl White | -- |
| -- | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| -- | 400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Intel Atom Z2760 chipset |
| Kryo 485 Gold, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3 MHz) processor | Saltwell (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (400 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR SGX 545 @ 533 MHz GPU |
| 3.78 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8720mAh Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.44 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is much better than the Xiaomi pad 5, getting a 65 score against 57.7. The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is a much older, heavier and somewhat thicker tablet than the Xiaomi pad 5. Samsung ATIV Tab 3 counts with Windows 8 OS, and Xiaomi pad 5 has Android 12 OS. The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi pad 5, although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Samsung ATIV Tab 3 features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi pad 5, although it has a lot lower 768 x 1366 resolution, a much worse pixels number per inch in the screen and a little smaller screen. Xiaomi pad 5 counts with a much better camera than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi pad 5 counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi pad 5 features a superior battery performance than Samsung ATIV Tab 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.