Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.7 | 74.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | Microsoft |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2016-07-18 | 2015-11-25 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.32 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Battery | 3340mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Lumia 950 XL is much better than the Acer Liquid Jade Primo, with a score of 74.7 against 61.7. Even though Lumia 950 XL and the Acer Liquid Jade Primo were released with only a couple months difference, Lumia 950 XL's design is a little heavier but also a little bit thinner. The Lumia 950 XL counts with just a bit better processing power than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Lumia 950 XL also has a greater number of cores.
The Lumia 950 XL counts with a bit sharper screen than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560, a quite bigger display and a greater pixels quantity per screen inch. Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with a lot better camera than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a camera with a lower 20 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images in low-light situations.
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 200 GB. Microsoft Lumia 950 XL features a bit superior battery lifetime than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has 3340mAh of battery capacity.
The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.