Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.32 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Acer Liquid Jade Primo, getting a overall score of 92.9 against 61.7. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with Android 10 operating system, while Acer Liquid Jade Primo counts with Windows 10 Mobile operating system. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a notably heavier cellphone than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, but both of them have the same thickness.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit sharper screen than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit more powerful processor than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has much more storage for applications and games than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a greater camera than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way more MP camera and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a really longer battery lifetime than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has a 57 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs the same than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.