Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | LG |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6752M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP2 (Dual-Core 416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is better than Acer Liquid Jade S's 68.6 general score. The LG V35 ThinQ design is extremely heavier but just a little bit thinner than Acer Liquid Jade S. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Acer Liquid Jade S, because it has a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a larger display and a lot greater pixels density.
Acer Liquid Jade S counts with just a bit better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Acer Liquid Jade S also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bits CPU. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Acer Liquid Jade S, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much longer battery duration than Acer Liquid Jade S, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh. LG V35 ThinQ takes much clearer pictures and videos than Acer Liquid Jade S, because it has a more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than Acer Liquid Jade S, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.