Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 68.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6752M chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP2 (Dual-Core 416 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is better than the Acer Liquid Jade S, with a overall score of 80.7 against 68.6. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has a newer 5.0 version and Acer Liquid Jade S has Android 4.4 version. The Galaxy Note 3 body is noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker than Acer Liquid Jade S.
Acer Liquid Jade S features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Acer Liquid Jade S also counts with a better 832 megahertz graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better looking display than Acer Liquid Jade S, because it has a quite bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note 3 takes clearer videos and photos than Acer Liquid Jade S, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in low light environments, and they both have a 13 MP back camera, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a lot higher video definition.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Acer Liquid Jade S, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 64 GB. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much longer battery duration than Acer Liquid Jade S, because it has a 39 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the Acer Liquid Jade S, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.