Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.54 x 3.39 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.15 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Acer Liquid S2, getting an 81.3 score against 65. LG V35 ThinQ is a thinner and incredibly lighter device than Acer Liquid S2. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Acer Liquid S2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Acer Liquid S2, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Acer Liquid S2, because it has 48 GB more internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Acer Liquid S2. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater camera than Acer Liquid S2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a more MP camera in the back and a lot bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than Acer Liquid S2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.