Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | LG |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.98 x 2.56 x 0.41 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (266 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.84 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is way better than Acer Liquid Z200, having a global score of 81.3 against 49.2. The LG V35 ThinQ design is noticeably thinner but heavier than Acer Liquid Z200. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater performance than Acer Liquid Z200, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a brighter display than Acer Liquid Z200, because it has a lot greater screen density, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a lot bigger screen. LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory to install games and applications than Acer Liquid Z200, because it has 64 GB internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ captures a lot better photos and videos than Acer Liquid Z200, because it has a way higher resolution back camera. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery performance than Acer Liquid Z200, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 1300mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than the Acer Liquid Z200, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.