Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 52.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2015-09-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.35 x 2.62 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.16 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is way better than Acer Liquid Z330's 52.9 score. The Galaxy Note 3 is an older and somewhat heavier device than Acer Liquid Z330, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Acer Liquid Z330 has Android 5.1.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much faster processing unit than Acer Liquid Z330, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory, an extra graphics processor and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better looking screen than Acer Liquid Z330, because it has a lot greater pixel density, a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Acer Liquid Z330, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 64 GB and 56 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better battery performance than Acer Liquid Z330, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 captures much better photos and videos than Acer Liquid Z330, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest one, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.