Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 60.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2015-09-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.15 x 3.05 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6753 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.6 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than Acer Liquid Z630S, with a general score of 80.7 against 60.4. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an older and a little heavier cellphone than the Acer Liquid Z630S, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Acer Liquid Z630S has Android 5.1.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a brighter display than Acer Liquid Z630S, because it has a lot higher 1920 x 1080px resolution, a better pixels quantity per inch in the display and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a better performance than Acer Liquid Z630S, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also has 7 more processing cores and an extra GPU.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Acer Liquid Z630S, because it has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 3 captures a lot better videos and photos than Acer Liquid Z630S, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Acer Liquid Z630S features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.