Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.05 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1500 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a lot better than Alcatel 5V's overall score of 67.8. Even though the Galaxy A50 and the Alcatel 5V were only released 8 months apart, the Galaxy A50 body is just a bit thinner but also a bit heavier. The Galaxy A50 has a much better display than Alcatel 5V, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bit bigger screen and much more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A50 features a little bit better processing power than Alcatel 5V, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A50 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Alcatel 5V, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory.
The Galaxy A50 has a battery performance that's very similar to Alcatel 5V's battery performance. The Galaxy A50 counts with a superior camera than Alcatel 5V, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger aperture for better low light photography.
The Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than Alcatel 5V, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.