Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 33.1 | 35.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | LG |
| -- | 2009-09-30 |
| 4.19 x 2.28 x 0.50 inches | 3.85 x 1.95 x 0.44 inches |
| 3.16 ounces | 3.07 ounces |
| Gray | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 79.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 3 inches |
| 160 x 128 pixels | 240 x 400 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 102 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Yes |
| 5.3 | 5.7 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | 43,01 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 3.00 MP |
| 4.73 | 5.06 |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 580mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 427 hours standby time 4.4 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 1.84 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Pop GD510 is a little bit better than the Alcatel 871A, having a global score of 35.7 against 33.1. The LG Pop GD510 is a a little lighter and thinner cellphone than Alcatel 871A. The Alcatel 871A and the LG Pop GD510 both feature incredibly similar CPUs, both have a 0-Core CPU. LG Pop GD510 has a little bit better looking screen than Alcatel 871A, because it has a lot bigger screen, a much better count of pixels per inch of display and a way higher 400 x 240 resolution.
LG Pop GD510 has just a bit better camera than Alcatel 871A, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera. The Alcatel 871A and the LG Pop GD510 have similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, although the LG Pop GD510 has less internal memory and no SD extension slot.
The LG Pop GD510 has a way better battery performance than Alcatel 871A, because it has a 55% bigger battery size.
The LG Pop GD510 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.